In the realm of outdoor activities, hiking and trekking are frequently considered synonymous, but do they truly convey the same concept? With numerous alternatives for hiking, such as hillwalking, rambling, strolling, and sauntering, one might wonder if trekking is merely another term for walking in nature. This article explores the definitions and distinguishing features of hiking and trekking, providing clarity on the type of adventure you are embarking on and how to prepare for it.
What is the difference between trekking and hiking?
Hiking and trekking both refer to outdoor walking, typically involving the use of hiking boots, but how distinct are they? Trekking is officially defined as a lengthy and challenging journey, particularly one undertaken on foot. The term originates from a South African Dutch word “trakk,” which means “to pull or travel.” In contrast, hiking is characterized as the act of taking long walks, especially in rural areas, with its etymology remaining unclear.
So, is the distinction merely a matter of terminology? In contemporary contexts, hiking and trekking are recognized as different pursuits, although the criteria for differentiation can be quite subjective. We examined the nuances between hiking and trekking and identified five significant differences that set these two activities apart.
Hiking vs trekking: distance
The terms hiking and trekking are often vaguely defined as simply “long.” Inquiring about the duration of a hike is akin to asking, “how long is a piece of string?” Ultimately, the length of a hike is determined by the time it takes for you to finish it. While there is no exact distance that distinguishes a hike from a trek, there are subjective differences that can be noted.
A hike is typically regarded as the shorter option between two activities, with a common consensus that if it can be completed in a single day, it qualifies as a hike. However, individual capabilities vary significantly; some may only manage five miles in a day, while others can cover nearly 30. Additionally, certain mountains that require just over a mile of steep ascent can still be perceived as a hike. The situation becomes more complex when considering a one-night backpacking excursion, which, even with a day of walking before and after, is still classified as a hike. In fact, a two or three-night journey may also fall under the same category. The definition becomes even more ambiguous when discussing what constitutes a thru-hike.
Trekking, in contrast, typically entails covering extensive distances. For instance, a trek in the Himalayas could exceed 100 miles. The interpretation of what constitutes a long distance can differ significantly between a beginner and an ultra-runner. However, for the purpose of establishing a clear distinction, we can assert that once the distance surpasses 40 miles, it is more likely categorized as a trek rather than a hike.
Hiking vs trekking: duration
This concept is closely related to distance. No matter your speed, the greater the distance, the more time it will require. Considering the varying lengths of hikes, a trek could last anywhere from one or two hours to several days. If we adopt the informal guideline that a trek is defined as 40 miles or more, it may take the average hiker approximately 4 to 5 days to finish. However, some individuals might complete it in just two days. Therefore, while there is no rigid definition, if your journey extends beyond a couple of days, it is likely classified as a trek.
Hiking vs trekking: destination
The next topic to consider is the aspect of destination. It is important to recognize that hiking does not necessarily require a specific endpoint. While one may hike to a mountain peak, a lake, or a waterfall, these landmarks do not define the essence of hiking; they merely enhance the experience. As long as the activity occurs outdoors in a natural setting, it qualifies as a hike.
Now, let’s discuss trekking. In contemporary terms, trekking typically implies a journey with a particular destination in mind, such as the two-week trek to Everest Base Camp or the extensive 500-mile pilgrimage along El Camino de Santiago. While not all treks carry spiritual significance—many are undertaken purely for pleasure—there is often a deeper meaning involved beyond a simple stroll in the hills near one’s home.
However, one could embark on a walk to the famed Mount Shasta for spiritual purposes and refer to it as a pilgrimage. Yet, at a distance of 10 miles, it would not be classified as a trek. Thus, when distinguishing between a hike and a trek, the destination is relevant primarily in terms of distance.
Hiking vs trekking: terrain
It is widely accepted that both hikes and treks occur in natural settings rather than urban areas. However, is there a distinction between the types of terrain encountered in hiking compared to trekking?
In contemporary terminology, hiking is generally associated with established trails and footpaths. Trekking, on the other hand, can occur on marked routes—such as the extensive 2,200-mile Appalachian Trail—but may also involve navigating areas without any defined paths, like the dense jungles of northern Thailand or the vast expanse of the Sahara Desert.
This differentiation also hinges on the distance traveled. For instance, you might frequently ascend a local mountain that lacks an official trail, but if the journey is only a few miles, it would not typically be classified as a trek simply due to the absence of a footpath.
Hiking vs trekking: enjoyment
The enjoyment aspect may be the most subjective of all categories, yet it is an important consideration when comparing hiking and trekking. While not explicitly stated in its definition, hiking often implies a sense of pleasure, as opposed to engaging in an activity solely for material rewards or specific objectives. Conversely, trekking is defined as “arduous,” indicating that it is inherently challenging and exhausting. Although there may be enjoyable moments during a trek, it can also be quite demanding.
Hiking can certainly be challenging as well, as anyone who has climbed a Colorado 14er can attest. However, by definition, hiking does not necessarily have to be strenuous. One can enjoy a leisurely three-mile loop beside a flowing stream in a meadow filled with wildflowers, and it would still qualify as a hike. If you find yourself trekking without experiencing some level of discomfort, you may either be misinterpreting the experience or have reached a state of bliss.
What is the difference between trekking and hiking?
The primary distinction between hiking and trekking appears to be related to the duration and distance involved, although factors such as terrain, purpose, and enjoyment also play a role. But why is this distinction significant?
Understanding the difference is crucial for determining the appropriate training, preparation, and equipment you will require. It’s important to note that there is no universal gear list that applies to both hiking and trekking. For a simple day hike, essentials may include quality hiking shoes, a water bottle, and a small daypack. Conversely, for a more extended hike, you should consider investing in sturdy boots, a layering system, and a tent. Ultimately, your gear choices will depend on the distance you plan to cover as well as the season and weather conditions.While longer hikes may necessitate specific training, many individuals can simply train on the trail and turn back when they feel fatigued.
